![]() I understand that ffmpeg must work on many different architecture, but if they not be able to encode correctly is better to adopt standard and limit the architecture then limit encoding capability. that's at least on linux systems an acceptable situation, which works really satisfying in real world too.Ĭarlomacchiavello wrote:Mmm what architecture no x86 they think to use for encode video? Arm? Or less performance arc? reliable exchange in practice - see: Īnd i wouldn't worry to much about apple and legal actions against ffmpeg or any other "free" software, which uses this very well written alternative implementations of prores. nevertheless there are still some significant cross platform/architecture incompatibles present, which make it a rather questionable choice for serious work resp. ![]() but in the meanwhile it isn't anymore a very hot topic. Well - the actual license of cineform looks indeed much more acceptable, than in those days, when we all saw it as real attractive alternative. Ffmpeg encode prores not legally be cause they not have bought right to do it. ![]() The reason be cause under windows few software can export prores officially. Carlomacchiavello wrote:Martin cineform is open source and you can implement encode decode free (with exception of raw that require a 20 dollar license), prores could be only decoded, if you want to encode prores officially you need to request and buy rights from apple.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |